The argument around the existence of an agreement is a focal point of the case.
The conflict between the parties raises issues of contractual and copyright problems within the Korean music industry.
[TV Daily Reporter Kim Han-gil] In the final argument regarding the 'ETA' Director's Cut video by NewJeans, the Dolphin Kidnappers emphasized the existence of an agreement, asking the court to dismiss Adore's claim for approximately 1.1 billion won in damages.
On the morning of December 9, the Seoul Central District Court's Civil Settlement Division 62, led by Judge Lee Hyun-seok, heard the case filed by Adore against Dolphin Kidnappers and Director Shin Woo-seok.
The dispute started in August last year when the Dolphin Kidnappers posted the 'ETA' Director's Cut music video on their YouTube channel without prior consent from Adore, who claimed it was an unauthorized release. Director Shin responded by deleting his videos from his unofficial channel and subsequently filed a criminal complaint against Adore for defamation.
The third hearing last month saw former Adore CEO Min Hee-jin testify, suggesting that it is common practice for directors to post their work on social media, while Adore argued that written consent is necessary for music videos due to the direct connection to brand and artist image.
The defense attorney stated, 'The plaintiff distorts facts by claiming that they were unaware of an existing agreement, and the claim for damages, despite an established agreement, is unreasonable.' They emphasized that the relationship between the parties has been positive and collaborative.
This case highlights a significant dispute regarding the protection of artists' rights within the Korean music industry. The incident surrounding NewJeans' 'ETA' video brings to light the need for clearer copyright and contractual practices.
The issue accentuates the necessity for clear written agreements when content is posted on unofficial channels or social media, emphasizing that agreements between artists must be explicitly documented. This case arises at a time where similar issues have been raised previously, indicating that reforms in the relevant legal framework may be necessary.
The Dolphin Kidnappers' assertion is rooted in their emphasis on maintaining a collaborative relationship, framing their case on the premise of an existing agreement to dismiss the compensation claim, which brings forth discussions around trust between artists and external partners.
This article is KOSTAR’s reinterpretation of a story originally reported by TVDaily.
Photo: TVDaily
