HYBE refuted her claim, stating the actual document is only 19 pages.
This incident reaffirms the importance of accurate fact dissemination in public statements.
Former ADOR CEO Min Hee-jin recently sparked controversy with her claim of a 'non-prosecution decision report exceeding 200 pages'. Critics argue that her statement may distort facts tied to ongoing disputes with HYBE. The company issued a statement refuting her claims, asserting that the actual document submitted was only 19 pages long. This issue highlights the importance of accuracy in public statements. Min argued strong against her allegations of embezzlement, suggesting that the report's size implies the presence of substantial evidence, yet the official submission contradicts this assertion.
Moreover, she explained that she received a 3-page notification following the non-prosecution decision and later acquired a 19-page report, alongside a 109-page investigation report. However, her vague differentiation of these document types during court proceedings raises questions about the credibility of her claims. Mistakes in expressing the nature of these documents could lead to significant message distortion.
Ultimately, this controversy contrasts with Min's earlier allegations of media manipulation by HYBE, painting her as potentially exaggerating her position, thereby undermining her statements with 'the non-prosecution decision exceeding 200 pages'.
Min Hee-jin's statement is closely tied to her legal troubles and ongoing disputes with HYBE. Her defensive stance, claiming media manipulation, risks undermining her credibility and trust in the public narrative. Given that such statements greatly influence public consciousness, the accuracy of factual content becomes paramount.
This incident reveals an attempt by Min to simplify a complex situation. However, by conflating the nature of legal documents, she risks significant repercussions, as accurate information delivery can shape both the perception of the severity of the alleged crimes and public understanding.
Additionally, the controversial statements could raise doubts about Min Hee-jin's public image. Announcements made in a legal context must be approached with caution, as misinformation can act detrimentally in legal circumstances. Providing clear, unembellished information is crucial, as distorting facts in favor of one's position may pose risks in the long run.
This article is KOSTAR’s reinterpretation of a story originally reported by TVDaily.
Photo: TVDaily
