The ruling on the foot option lawsuit set for February 12 is pivotal for her fate.
The legal struggles entwine complex issues surrounding Min Hee-jin and NewJeans.
At a press conference on the 28th, former Adore CEO Min Hee-jin strongly rebutted allegations of 'NewJeans tampering'. Through her legal representation at Ji-Am Law Firm, she claimed that these allegations were a 'public fraud scheme' orchestrated by DaBorlink and a family member of a NewJeans member. The core of the allegations focuses on her connections with Haein's family, which she vehemently denies.
Min Hee-jin is facing a pivotal court decision regarding a foot option lawsuit set for February 12th, which could determine whether she receives 26 billion won. On the other hand, Adore has filed a lawsuit against her and NewJeans' Danielle for 43.1 billion won, escalating the ongoing legal conflicts between the parties. All of these developments center around the essence of the 'tampering allegations', putting Min Hee-jin in a precarious position with no room for retreat.
During the press conference, her attorney posited that the 'tampering allegations' were orchestrated by HYBE, but the lack of clear explanations for the allegations was notable. She appears to be navigating a complicated scenario, particularly regarding her deteriorating relationship with Haein, as she tries to strategize her legal response without providing sufficient clarity.
Min Hee-jin's current situation exemplifies a convoluted web of legal conflicts. Her efforts to maintain a strong bond with NewJeans have created immense psychological pressure on her. While her stature has been elevated due to the group's success, the legal challenges she faces might negatively affect her future endeavors and career trajectory. It will be particularly interesting to see how she navigates and resolves this situation going forward.
The court's ruling will not only impose financial repercussions but also significantly influence Min Hee-jin's image and overall professional standing. Given that the 'tampering allegations' are closely tied to her reputation, the upcoming lawsuit outcome is viewed as a critical juncture for her public image rehabilitation. This is likely to shape perspectives on conflicts between artists and management within the broader industry context as well.
Finally, this incident serves as a reminder of the complex dynamics between artists and their management companies in the K-POP industry. It highlights potential conflicts arising from issues of trust and communication between agencies and artists, signaling that similar problems could emerge in relationships with fans as well.
This article is KOSTAR’s reinterpretation of a story originally reported by TVDaily.
Photo: TVDaily
